Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Victoria Ship Managementyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Victoria Ship Management | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 46 |
| CO₂ emitted | 160 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 76 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 8.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Victoria Ship Management8.0 (−2% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | 29 | 8.0 | −2% | 73 | 10.3 | 1,768 | 4.0% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Victoria Ship Management18.2 (+9% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | 17 | 18.2 | +9% | 81 | 7.3 | 2,553 | 5.9% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | Bureau Veritas (46) | 0% | 28% | 98% | 0% |
Victoria Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVA FUKUOKA | 9989182 | Chemical tanker | 26.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +60% | 7.0 | 383 t | €6k |
| EVA MANILA | 9918602 | Chemical tanker | 20.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +24% | 8.5 | 5,907 t | €124k |
| EVA HONGKONG | 9800001 | Chemical tanker | 19.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +21% | 4.8 | 6,296 t | €100k |
| VARI TRADER | 9800025 | Chemical tanker | 28.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +19% | 7.2 | 8,228 t | €182k |
| NORD SANTIAGO | 9831488 | Bulk carrier | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +6% | 11.1 | 5,319 t | €92k |
| EVA BERGEN | 9800013 | Chemical tanker | 24.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +5% | 6.8 | 3,170 t | €53k |
| BRIGHTEN TRADER | 9771482 | Bulk carrier | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | +3% | 9.7 | 3,845 t | €67k |
| EVA PEARL | 9985992 | Chemical tanker | 24.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +3% | 5.4 | 4,367 t | €113k |
| HAMBURG TEAM | 9855460 | Bulk carrier | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +1% | 10.2 | 1,005 t | €16k |
| CONDOR TRADER | 9742077 | Chemical tanker | 16.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | 0% | 7.4 | 3,932 t | €67k |
| WESTERN MIAMI | 9743215 | Bulk carrier | 9.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −1% | 10.1 | 3,130 t | €59k |
| WESTERN SANTIAGO | 9838503 | Bulk carrier | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −2% | 10.9 | 2,176 t | €40k |
| CLEAROCEAN MILANO | 9917658 | Chemical tanker | 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −5% | 11.9 | 8,229 t | €167k |
| EVA HANSA | 9985980 | Chemical tanker | 22.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −7% | 4.8 | 5,107 t | €89k |
| BIRDIE TRADER | 9724099 | Chemical tanker | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 6.8 | 5,657 t | €112k |
| COPENHAGEN BULKER | 9831490 | Bulk carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −10% | 11.3 | 2,165 t | €32k |
| BAI IZMIR | 9855410 | Bulk carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −11% | 10.5 | 6,430 t | €103k |
| LINDEN TRADER | 9867578 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | −11% | 12.4 | 4,795 t | €73k |
| ASTON TRADER | 9808675 | Bulk carrier | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −11% | 9.9 | 8,325 t | €143k |
| WESTERN TOKYO | 9838498 | Bulk carrier | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −12% | 5.2 | 787 t | €13k |
| BRISTOL TRADER | 9737101 | Chemical tanker | 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −13% | 11.5 | 7,130 t | €117k |
| EVA FUJI | 9914242 | Chemical tanker | 14.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −13% | 7.9 | 3,198 t | €48k |
| HAMBURG PEARL | 9747247 | Bulk carrier | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −15% | 8.9 | 7,199 t | €118k |
| EVA USUKI | 9865532 | Chemical tanker | 13.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −20% | 9.6 | 3,842 t | €67k |
| WESTERN DONCASTER | 9831505 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −27% | 10.4 | 6,297 t | €109k |
| WESTERN STABAEK | 9989273 | Bulk carrier | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −27% | 9.9 | 3,554 t | €60k |
| NY SUNRISE | 9934814 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −27% | 11.5 | 3,135 t | €49k |
| HAMBURG WAY | 9743227 | Bulk carrier | 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −29% | 11.2 | 3,807 t | €63k |
| OSHIMA JAPAN | 9872975 | Bulk carrier | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | −32% | 11.3 | 1,920 t | €29k |
| EVA TOKYO | 9865520 | Chemical tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −35% | 9.1 | 576 t | €9k |
30 of 46 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.