Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

HAMBURG WAY

IMO: 9743227
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 19,913 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.64 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,469 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.7

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.94

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (−4%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,899 t

CO₂ emitted

5,956 t

Distance sailed

23,837 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,626 h

109 days, 30% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.2 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−18%)

61.8Ranks 639 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+34%)

4.85Ranks 2,304 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU40%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

1,726 t

91% of all fuel; 9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

437 t

7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HAMBURG WAY
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

HAMBURG WAY
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAMBURG WAY
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−13%	+7%	−26%	+37%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.5 kn	−7%	−33%	+2,505%	−54%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+12%	+29%	−95%	+23%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−8%	−9%	+7%	+55%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	+12%	+40%	−1%	+6%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.6 kn	−7%	−29%	+94%	+1%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	1,219	3,807	17,618	1,570	11.2	69.2	10.9	98%
2023	not published	1,899	5,956	23,837	2,626	9.1	79.7	7.94	91%
2022	not published	78	250	915	73	12.6	85.3	17.3	43%
2021	not published	1,501	4,719	19,669	1,801	10.9	76.3	14.1	77%
2020	not published	1,522	4,789	18,334	1,671	11.0	83.0	9.10	82%
2019	not published	1,369	4,314	18,429	2,100	8.8	74.3	8.57	86%
2018	not published	762	2,396	9,520	836	11.4	80.0	8.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	10.9	8.09	+34%	2,304 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023	not published	7.94	8.27	−4%	1,614 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	17.3	8.71	+99%	3,591 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	14.1	8.57	+65%	3,015 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	9.10	8.24	+10%	1,906 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	8.57	8.38	+2%	1,744 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	8.50	8.50	+0%	1,692 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.