Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

IONIAN BAY

IMO
9747247
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
25,818 t
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
HAMBURG PEARL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,735 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
87.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
158
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
11.3 kn
Fuel per day at sea
23.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,632 t
CO₂ emitted
5,104 t
Distance sailed
18,568 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,640 h
68 days, 19% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−6%)
61.0Ranks 1,430 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.7 (−12%)
8.8Faster than 16% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+20%)
4.80Ranks 2,427 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU36%
  • Into the EU53%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
85 t
5% of all fuel; 95% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
194 t
3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • IONIAN BAY
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • IONIAN BAY
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • IONIAN BAY
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.5 kn+3%+9%−45%+14%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.7 kn+1%−15%+30%−33%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.6 kn−8%−21%+95%+33%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.9 kn−8%−0%−35%–0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+2.7 kn+13%+49%+91%–2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.7 kn−1%−8%+31%−36%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn−15%−14%−61%+22%Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearVICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.1,2784,01816,8351,7929.475.99.1490%
2025PIONEER MARINE HELLAS S.A.1,3214,15717,0211,8089.477.69.4687%
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.2,3047,19930,7453,4408.975.08.3188%
2023not published1,7595,49823,6192,22910.674.512.485%
2022not published9863,09312,13199412.281.39.3382%
2021not published1,6325,10418,5681,64011.387.91585%
2020not published7562,3689,7431,1368.677.57.2286%
2019not published5791,8337,4198009.378.111.465%
2018not published1,7485,50019,0862,0649.291.69.30–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearVICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.––––Bureau VeritasC
2025PIONEER MARINE HELLAS S.A.9.467.90+20%2,427 of 3,611Lloyd's RegisterA
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.8.318.09+3%1,622 of 3,089Bureau VeritasB+C
2023not published12.48.27+50%2,828 of 3,548Bureau VeritasC
2022not published9.338.71+7%2,242 of 3,968Bureau VeritasC
2021not published––––Bureau VeritasC
2020not published7.228.24−12%1,153 of 3,150Bureau VeritasC
2019not published11.48.38+36%2,567 of 3,360Bureau VeritasC
2018not published9.308.50+9%1,990 of 3,384Bureau Veritas–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.