Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC SPACE

IMO: 9748681
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 98,245 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.64 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU · part of Columbia Shipmanagement

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 73,551 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

139

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.90

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−33%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,711 t

CO₂ emitted

11,629 t

Distance sailed

26,799 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,184 h

133 days, 36% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 137 kg/nm · median 129 (+6%)

79.5Ranks 1,056 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.9 (+3%)

8.1Faster than 60% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (−46%)

4.44Ranks 168 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU27%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,018 t

8.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDIC SPACE
Oil tanker median

125.0130.0135.0140.0145.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NORDIC SPACE
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC SPACE
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+7%	+9%	−40%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−4%	−16%	+118%	−4%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	−10%	+9%	−28%	−2%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+5%	+8%	+7%	−18%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+2%	+22%	−25%	+7%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	+1%	−27%	+43%	−12%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	2,819	8,819	20,541	1,830	11.2	137	4.37	67%
2023	not published	4,362	13,684	33,999	3,069	11.1	128	4.85	59%
2022	not published	2,074	6,475	15,565	1,233	12.6	133	5.04	59%
2021	not published	3,177	9,944	21,515	2,068	10.4	148	5.16	68%
2020	not published	2,817	8,913	20,022	1,982	10.1	141	6.31	–
2019	not published	3,711	11,629	26,799	3,184	8.4	139	5.90	–
2018	not published	2,573	8,059	18,759	1,617	11.6	137	6.74	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	4.37	8.06	−46%	168 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	4.85	8.44	−43%	196 of 1,797	ABS	B
2022	not published	5.04	8.51	−41%	251 of 1,961	ABS	B
2021	not published	5.16	8.86	−42%	250 of 1,789	ABS	B
2020	not published	6.31	9.03	−30%	421 of 1,870	ABS	B
2019	not published	5.90	8.83	−33%	409 of 1,919	ABS	B
2018	not published	6.74	8.86	−24%	530 of 1,779	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.