Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Columbia Shipmanagement
Ships93
CO₂ emitted938 kt
Fuel per mile122 kg/nm
Average speed11.0 kn
CO₂ at berth6.4%
Ships burning LNG1
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Columbia Shipmanagement8.3 (+3%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement268.3+3%14910.62,9869.3%1
Segment median 8.10%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • Columbia Shipmanagement31.2 (+78%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement2431.2+78%12211.13,0774.3%–
Segment median 17.50%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Columbia Shipmanagement8.3 (−50%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement178.3−50%8611.31,7236.3%–
Segment median 16.70%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

  • Columbia Shipmanagement22.9 (+19%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement1222.9+19%7412.92,0444.1%–
Segment median 19.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Columbia Shipmanagement8.5 (+5%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement108.5+5%8910.71,6884.0%–
Segment median 8.10%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Columbia ShipmanagementABS (89), DNV (4)100%0%0%0%

Columbia Shipmanagement: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
PLATA EAST9410997Oil tanker9.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+117%11.2951 t€19k
LILSTELLA9794771Oil tanker52.9 g CO₂/t·nm25.2+110%11.07,594 t€124k
CARIBBEAN LOYALTY9501150Oil tanker8.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+98%13.619,306 t€324k
YM INVENTIVE9319105Container38.4 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+76%5.06,047 t€113k
SAFEEN STRENGTH9543524Oil tanker13.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+64%12.56,045 t€121k
AAL BRISBANE9498341Other39.6 g CO₂/t·nm24.4+62%12.26,812 t€78k
CAPE KOURION9481441Bulk carrier7.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+52%6.61,674 t€28k
AAL LIMASSOL9958755General cargo29.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+51%13.85,056 t€98k
BALTIC LOYALTY9411953Oil tanker6.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+51%10.635,182 t€621k
AAL HAMBURG9958767Other51.6 g CO₂/t·nm35.4+46%13.26,719 t€110k
PACIFIC DALIAN9339090Container67.4 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+43%11.98,269 t€201k
ALATAU9416551Oil tanker11.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+42%8.418,058 t€309k
SAFEEN BARONESS9460576Oil tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+38%7.515,373 t€278k
CAPE FULMAR9359313Container29.4 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+35%10.94,111 t€75k
PETROLINA OCEAN9460617Chemical tanker55.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+34%8.73,821 t€76k
NORDIC LIGHT9436446Oil tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+34%9.825,901 t€476k
ALTAI9446427Oil tanker11.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+34%10.518,752 t€318k
CAPE AKAMAS9481453Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+34%10.613,429 t€215k
SAFEEN ELIZABETH9524449Oil tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+31%11.112,609 t€212k
ATLANTIC MONACO9356658Container59.4 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+26%9.56,860 t€139k
CAPE FRANKLIN9359301Container27.1 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+24%10.511,758 t€264k
CAPE SCOTT9950117Container58.6 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+24%13.9902 t€14k
SAFEEN ELONA9488011Oil tanker10.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+23%9.518,941 t€327k
CAPE BENAT9406013Oil tanker7.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+20%11.326,196 t€301k
VALENTIN BUTUZOV9707651Bulk carrier7.8 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+18%12.36,107 t€94k
ATLANTIC GENEVA9330848Container55.1 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+17%10.65,331 t€105k
FOUR RIGOLETTO9450674Bulk carrier11.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+13%10.73,284 t€51k
AAL MERKUR9509695Other27.2 g CO₂/t·nm24.4+12%12.811,507 t€178k
NORDIC ZENITH9588469Oil tanker7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+10%9.626,209 t€424k
NYK RUMINA9416991Container15.8 g CO₂/t·nm14.5+9%10.88,735 t€164k

30 of 96 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.