Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GREAT SHANG

IMO: 9766906
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,256 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MARITIME VOYAGER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SEACON SHIPS MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. · part of Seacon

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,256 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

84.0 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+57%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

987 t

CO₂ emitted

3,088 t

3,136 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,753 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

985 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 84.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+2%)

61.0Ranks 1,902 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 10.7 (+11%)

8.8Faster than 92% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+57%)

4.80Ranks 2,989 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU45%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,629 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GREAT SHANG
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GREAT SHANG
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

GREAT SHANG
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	−75%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	+33%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−2%	−11%	+167%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.3 kn	−1%	+32%	+46%	−73%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+19%	−1%	−8%	+358%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SEACON SHIPS MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	987	3,088	11,753	985	11.9	84.0	12.36	–
2024	SEACON SHIPS MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	3,889	12,116	47,330	3,978	11.9	82.2	12.91	–
2023	not published	3,149	9,814	35,481	3,012	11.8	88.7	15.12	–
2022	not published	1,201	3,745	13,311	1,021	13.0	90.2	12.89	–
2021	not published	832	2,626	9,106	937	9.7	91.4	48.16	–
2020	not published	759	2,365	9,868	848	11.6	76.9	11.72	4%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SEACON SHIPS MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	12.36	7.89	+57%	2,989 of 3,610	China Classification Society	A
2024	SEACON SHIPS MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	12.91	8.09	+60%	2,595 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	15.12	8.27	+83%	3,097 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	12.89	8.71	+48%	3,159 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	48.16	22.70	+112%	1,062 of 1,142	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	10.52	24.50	−57%	104 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.