Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Seaconyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Seacon | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 74 |
| CO₂ emitted | 355 kt+53.5% |
| Fuel per mile | 87 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 3 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Seacon7.3 (−7% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 39 | 7.3 | −7% | 88 | 10.8 | 1,341 | 4.5% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Seacon8.5 (−67% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 15 | 8.5 | −67% | 87 | 11.8 | 1,982 | 4.6% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Seacon21.2 (+167% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 8 | 21.2 | +167% | 66 | 9.6 | 2,473 | 9.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- Seacon68.8 (+24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 6 | 68.8 | +24% | 99 | 14.5 | 1,465 | 2.8% | 3 |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Seacon308 (+223% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 2 | 308 | +223% | 100 | 15.3 | 2,517 | 2.3% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Seacon14.2 (−5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 3 | 14.2 | −5% | 100 | 10.2 | 1,855 | 15.5% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Seacon19.2 (+18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | 1 | 19.2 | +18% | 76 | 11.1 | 609 | 0.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacon | China Classification Society (65), Bureau Veritas (4), Verifavia (4) | 99% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Seacon: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNICORN | 9595931 | Bulk carrier | 235 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +1412% | 5.7 | 274 t | €9k |
| GOLDEN DAY | 9209128 | Bulk carrier | 219 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +1312% | 11.8 | 1,234 t | €34k |
| LV STAR | 9553218 | Bulk carrier | 201 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +1198% | 11.8 | 8,572 t | €238k |
| GREEN PORTOCEL | 9976408 | General cargo | 290 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +1039% | 13.7 | 2,174 t | €59k |
| PRINCESS MIA | 9318357 | Bulk carrier | 121 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +682% | 11.1 | 387 t | €10k |
| GREEN PECEM | 9976484 | General cargo | 157 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +518% | 14.4 | 1,160 t | €30k |
| MSXT EMILY | 9929302 | Bulk carrier | 59.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +283% | 12.2 | 3,987 t | €106k |
| LU YANG SHUN | 9634880 | Bulk carrier | 33.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +114% | 11.3 | 1,915 t | €72k |
| FN OCEAN | 9567441 | Bulk carrier | 19.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +107% | 6.1 | 1,587 t | €67k |
| BYD ZHENGZHOU | 9999577 | Ro-ro | 565 g CO₂/t·nm | 297 | +90% | 15.8 | 3,772 t | €104k |
| GOLDEN ORCHID | 9486178 | Chemical tanker | 39.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +83% | 9.4 | 6,134 t | €259k |
| BAUSTELLA | 9812133 | Oil tanker | 44.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +64% | 7.6 | 7,661 t | €284k |
| LI DA CHANG | 9547817 | Bulk carrier | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +55% | 7.1 | 1,853 t | €53k |
| DYLAN | 9421336 | Chemical tanker | 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +41% | 10.4 | 10,625 t | €313k |
| LUYANG SMOOTH | 9538763 | Bulk carrier | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +39% | 9.9 | 7,209 t | €192k |
| HORIZON JADE | 9579054 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +34% | 10.5 | 8,117 t | €234k |
| GREAT SHANG | 9766906 | Bulk carrier | 12.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +30% | 11.9 | 3,088 t | €86k |
| XYG HONG KONG | 9372925 | General cargo | 33.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +29% | 12.2 | 7,253 t | €0 |
| BEI LUN HAI SHI | 9207766 | Bulk carrier | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +25% | 11.1 | 4,200 t | €116k |
| HONY FUTURE | 9583823 | Bulk carrier | 5.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +18% | 10.0 | 3,522 t | €100k |
| EMERALD DONGJI | 9726528 | Bulk carrier | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +18% | 11.2 | 4,913 t | €147k |
| HARVEST | 9297931 | Bulk carrier | 5.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +17% | 8.4 | 4,345 t | €127k |
| AICC KUNPENG | 1018389 | Vehicle carrier | 63.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +15% | 11.6 | 4,316 t | €129k |
| EMERALD DAISHAN | 9981295 | Bulk carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +14% | 11.3 | 6,894 t | €189k |
| SEACON 7 | 9487665 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +8% | 11.1 | 6,976 t | €223k |
| EMERALD SHENGSI | 9981300 | Bulk carrier | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +6% | 12.3 | 2,959 t | €81k |
| GUO QIANG 8 | 9722065 | Bulk carrier | 5.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +5% | 10.8 | 7,887 t | €211k |
| HUANG HE KOULNG | 9985368 | Vehicle carrier | 79.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +4% | 16.4 | 4,279 t | €119k |
| YONG HAI 9 | 9500948 | Bulk carrier | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +4% | 11.8 | 5,782 t | €170k |
| EMERALD BAISHA | 9726530 | Bulk carrier | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +4% | 11.4 | 3,834 t | €110k |
30 of 74 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.