Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL HONG KONG

IMO: 9776171
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 104,342 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.78 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 130,773 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

284

Container median 178 kg/nm (+60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−64%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,247 t

CO₂ emitted

38,429 t

Distance sailed

43,088 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,702 h

113 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 301 kg/nm · median 177 (+70%)

78.8Ranks 1,981 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 457 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU55%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

11,953 t

98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

934 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL HONG KONG
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL HONG KONG
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL HONG KONG
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+6%	+8%	+36%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+27%	+50%	+55%	−17%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.7 kn	−22%	−35%	+1%	+23%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+3%	+7%	−17%	+18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−1%	+4%	−32%	−1%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−4%	−13%	−12%	−5%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+4%	+2%	+4%	−2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	27,512	85,240	91,277	5,819	15.7	301	8.95	99%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	19,079	59,540	67,335	4,358	15.5	283	6.91	98%
2023	not published	9,692	30,432	43,576	3,312	13.2	222	8.36	98%
2022	not published	12,247	38,429	43,088	2,702	15.9	284	6.82	98%
2021	not published	14,329	44,918	51,858	3,375	15.4	276	5.78	98%
2020	not published	21,386	66,946	76,701	5,237	14.6	279	5.84	–
2019	not published	25,195	78,884	86,938	5,368	16.2	290	6.14	–
2018	not published	23,256	72,856	83,425	5,036	16.6	279	6.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	8.95	16.3	−45%	457 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	6.91	17.5	−61%	142 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	8.36	19.4	−57%	270 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	6.82	19.1	−64%	122 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	5.78	17.9	−68%	39 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	5.84	17.6	−67%	49 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	6.14	18.9	−67%	50 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	6.25	20.2	−69%	14 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.