Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL GERMANY

IMO: 9776183
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 100,552 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 132,810 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

310

Container median 182 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.31

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−64%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

120.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

26,104 t

CO₂ emitted

81,688 t

Distance sailed

84,141 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,188 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 286 kg/nm · median 177 (+62%)

78.8Ranks 1,901 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−46%)

7.22Ranks 439 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU44%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,838 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL GERMANY
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL GERMANY
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL GERMANY
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+5%	+10%	+27%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+13%	+21%	+13%	+1%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−14%	−17%	−8%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−17%	−13%	−1%	−2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+15%	+6%	−28%	+21%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	−25%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−7%	−11%	−5%	−10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	15,926	49,402	55,704	3,470	16.1	286	8.82	98%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	11,892	37,253	43,730	2,855	15.3	272	7.27	98%
2023	not published	9,333	29,347	38,749	2,711	14.3	241	7.21	97%
2022	not published	11,710	36,712	42,013	2,810	15.0	279	7.14	98%
2021	not published	14,294	44,897	42,616	2,978	14.3	335	7.31	98%
2020	not published	17,382	54,386	59,506	3,853	15.4	292	6.04	–
2019	not published	22,927	71,848	79,697	5,106	15.6	288	6.60	–
2018	not published	26,104	81,688	84,141	5,188	16.2	310	7.31	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	8.82	16.3	−46%	439 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	7.27	17.5	−59%	188 of 1,974	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	7.21	19.4	−63%	177 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	7.14	19.1	−63%	151 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	7.31	17.9	−59%	160 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	6.04	17.6	−66%	72 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	6.60	18.9	−65%	88 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	7.31	20.2	−64%	84 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.