Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL UNITED KINGDOM

IMO: 9776200
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 97,272 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.74 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 97,272 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

285.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−44%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,216 t

CO₂ emitted

44,199 t

44,897 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,769 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,407 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 285.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+61%)

78.8Ranks 1,901 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 70% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−44%)

7.22Ranks 473 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU83%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (23,118 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+4%	+7%	+5%	+28%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+9%	+5%	+10%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−6%	−11%	+1%	−0%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	−17%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−0%	+3%	−34%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−7%	−1%	+1%	−11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	−0%	−11%	−20%	+1%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	14,216	44,199	49,769	3,407	14.6	285.6	9.13	99%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	13,058	40,846	47,358	3,358	14.1	275.7	7.11	98%
2023	not published	10,916	34,264	43,015	2,956	14.6	253.8	6.78	97%
2022	not published	11,529	36,174	42,797	2,784	15.4	269.4	6.81	97%
2021	not published	14,676	46,007	51,451	3,172	16.2	285.2	6.27	98%
2020	not published	22,116	69,256	77,473	4,942	15.7	285.5	6.06	–
2019	not published	23,476	73,459	76,576	5,168	14.8	306.6	6.83	–
2018	not published	29,444	92,183	95,627	5,743	16.6	307.9	6.79	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	9.13	16.30	−44%	473 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	7.11	17.52	−59%	166 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	6.78	19.40	−65%	133 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	6.81	19.13	−64%	119 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	6.27	17.90	−65%	82 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	6.06	17.58	−66%	72 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	6.83	18.88	−64%	105 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	6.79	20.22	−66%	43 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.