Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL SCANDINAVIA

IMO: 9776212
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 119,908 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 145,907 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

294

Container median 186 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−65%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,097 t

CO₂ emitted

53,595 t

Distance sailed

58,121 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,542 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 303 kg/nm · median 177 (+71%)

78.8Ranks 1,992 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−52%)

7.22Ranks 322 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU61%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,738 t

98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,152 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL SCANDINAVIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL SCANDINAVIA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL SCANDINAVIA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	+25%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+11%	+13%	+91%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−12%	−21%	−15%	+14%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−3%	−4%	−30%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+6%	+11%	−30%	+7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	−2%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−14%	−22%	−3%	−11%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	25,293	78,493	83,389	5,586	14.9	303	7.85	98%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	18,643	58,197	66,516	4,483	14.8	280	6.70	98%
2023	not published	8,816	27,728	34,760	2,398	14.5	254	7.29	98%
2022	not published	11,717	36,705	40,886	2,534	16.1	287	6.40	98%
2021	not published	17,097	53,595	58,121	3,542	16.4	294	6.32	98%
2020	not published	22,966	71,981	83,042	5,278	15.7	277	5.89	–
2019	not published	22,612	70,759	84,895	5,557	15.3	266	5.94	–
2018	not published	27,132	84,976	87,461	5,221	16.8	310	6.71	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	7.85	16.3	−52%	322 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	6.70	17.5	−62%	130 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	7.29	19.4	−62%	184 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	6.40	19.1	−67%	75 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	6.32	17.9	−65%	87 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	5.89	17.6	−66%	56 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	5.94	18.9	−69%	29 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	6.71	20.2	−67%	38 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.