Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL INDONESIA

IMO: 9776224
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 120,560 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 125,170 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

278

Container median 165 kg/nm (+68%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.96

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−64%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,907 t

CO₂ emitted

37,346 t

Distance sailed

42,868 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,958 h

123 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 322 kg/nm · median 177 (+82%)

78.8Ranks 2,073 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 375 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU58%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

11,562 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,102 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL INDONESIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL INDONESIA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL INDONESIA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+10%	+6%	+24%	+4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+5%	+15%	+74%	+15%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−1%	−10%	−1%	+7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	−20%	+1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	−1%	+9%	−31%	+7%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−3%	−9%	−11%	−6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	−9%	−17%	+2%	−7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	29,781	92,489	92,541	6,023	15.4	322	8.29	98%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	21,797	67,956	74,437	4,691	15.9	293	8.00	98%
2023	not published	11,907	37,346	42,868	2,958	14.5	278	6.96	97%
2022	not published	12,210	38,317	43,392	2,728	15.9	281	6.53	97%
2021	not published	15,157	47,525	54,145	3,311	16.4	280	6.47	98%
2020	not published	22,016	68,926	78,069	5,225	14.9	282	6.03	–
2019	not published	25,569	80,102	87,681	5,534	15.8	292	6.43	–
2018	not published	27,531	86,156	86,030	4,952	17.4	320	6.93	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	8.29	16.3	−49%	375 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	8.00	17.5	−54%	272 of 1,974	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	6.96	19.4	−64%	152 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	6.53	19.1	−66%	88 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	6.47	17.9	−64%	98 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	6.03	17.6	−66%	70 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	6.43	18.9	−66%	66 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	6.93	20.2	−66%	55 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.