Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING PISCES

IMO: 9789647
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 109,022 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 147,564 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

283

Container median 172 kg/nm (+64%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.99

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−66%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,961 t

CO₂ emitted

68,556 t

Distance sailed

77,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,871 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 312 kg/nm · median 177 (+76%)

78.8Ranks 2,031 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)

9.1Faster than 96% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 457 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU26%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,590 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING PISCES
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING PISCES
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING PISCES
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+9%	+16%	−2%	+31%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.0 kn	+25%	+44%	+107%	+28%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−12%	−15%	−0%	−13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	−4%	−17%	−16%	+1%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	−33%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+1%	−3%	+106%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	27,414	85,754	87,885	5,258	16.7	312	8.95	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	25,781	80,553	89,750	5,762	15.6	287	6.84	–
2023	not published	9,926	31,040	43,342	3,186	13.6	229	5.35	–
2022	not published	11,296	35,307	43,431	3,093	14.0	260	6.16	–
2021	not published	14,102	44,038	51,803	3,218	16.1	272	6.12	–
2020	not published	21,961	68,556	77,559	4,871	15.9	283	5.99	–
2019	not published	10,563	32,963	37,707	2,271	16.6	280	6.56	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	8.95	16.3	−45%	457 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A+B
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	6.84	17.5	−61%	138 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A+B
2023	not published	5.35	19.4	−72%	19 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A+B
2022	not published	6.16	19.1	−68%	47 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.12	17.9	−66%	69 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	5.99	17.6	−66%	65 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.56	18.9	−65%	84 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.