Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE

IMO: 9795610
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 135,472 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 153,075 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

315

Container median 172 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.41

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−64%)

Average speed

17.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

133.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

28,977 t

CO₂ emitted

90,345 t

Distance sailed

92,076 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,193 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 276 kg/nm · median 177 (+56%)

78.8Ranks 1,839 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−61%)

7.22Ranks 95 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU57%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,744 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	+0%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−4%	−6%	+22%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	−1%	+11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−4%	−9%	−10%	+4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−1%	−5%	−2%	+2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	+3%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+4%	+6%	+48%	−10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	27,205	84,807	98,430	6,161	16.0	276	6.36	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	27,975	87,218	98,021	6,053	16.2	285	7.53	–
2023	not published	23,754	74,068	80,277	4,843	16.6	296	7.58	–
2022	not published	24,141	75,282	80,907	5,018	16.1	298	6.85	–
2021	not published	27,981	87,244	90,236	5,295	17.0	310	6.56	–
2020	not published	28,977	90,345	92,076	5,193	17.7	315	6.41	–
2019	not published	28,540	88,989	89,633	5,024	17.8	318	6.53	–
2018	not published	18,628	58,088	60,563	3,482	17.4	308	7.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	6.36	16.3	−61%	95 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	7.53	17.5	−57%	221 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	7.58	19.4	−61%	209 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.85	19.1	−64%	126 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.56	17.9	−63%	105 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.41	17.6	−64%	122 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.53	18.9	−65%	82 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.24	20.2	−64%	77 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.