Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY

IMO: 9795634
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 130,532 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 148,657 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

274

Container median 172 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−67%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

103.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,469 t

CO₂ emitted

73,286 t

Distance sailed

85,737 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,470 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 316 kg/nm · median 177 (+78%)

78.8Ranks 2,053 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 272 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU23%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,319 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+0%	−2%	+41%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+2.6 kn	+33%	+59%	+56%	+23%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−12%	−21%	−29%	−16%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−14%	−12%	+53%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+14%	+7%	−52%	+20%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	+50%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	31,001	96,650	98,201	6,190	15.9	316	7.54	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	21,941	68,379	69,560	4,298	16.2	315	7.07	–
2023	not published	10,527	32,912	44,548	3,273	13.6	236	5.76	–
2022	not published	16,814	52,558	62,829	4,134	15.2	268	6.88	–
2021	not published	12,733	39,827	40,946	2,770	14.8	311	6.90	–
2020	not published	23,469	73,286	85,737	5,470	15.7	274	5.75	–
2019	not published	15,921	49,711	57,027	3,598	15.9	279	6.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	7.54	16.3	−54%	272 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	7.07	17.5	−60%	160 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	5.76	19.4	−70%	34 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.88	19.1	−64%	128 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.90	17.9	−61%	135 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	5.75	17.6	−67%	36 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.07	18.9	−68%	41 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.