Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ACTION TRADER

IMO
9808663
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
21,436 t
Flag (estimated)
Philippines
Port of registry
Manila
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.53 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,387 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
59.4
Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−31%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+23%)
Average speed
10.1 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−9%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,006 t
CO₂ emitted
6,296 t
Distance sailed
33,767 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,336 h
139 days, 38% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+1%)
61.0Ranks 1,878 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 10.7 (−7%)
8.8Faster than 24% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+55%)
4.80Ranks 2,983 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports54%
  • From the EU18%
  • Into the EU24%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
1,224 t
61% of all fuel; 39% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
241 t
3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ACTION TRADER
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • ACTION TRADER
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ACTION TRADER
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn+19%+13%−50%+320%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.7 kn−14%−19%+43%−68%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.0 kn−1%−0%+86%+14%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+0.1 kn+53%+55%−63%+12%Same speed, fuel per mile up 53%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.9 kn−10%−2%−14%−29%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.4 kn−18%−5%+108%+32%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.7 kn−8%−30%+12%+2%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.1,2043,78114,3861,4589.983.712.379%
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.2,0216,35128,8092,77910.470.22.9293%
2023not published1,6365,15520,1181,81211.181.39.1380%
2022not published8882,77310,80897711.182.18.0292%
2021not published1,5614,88629,1842,64911.053.57.1990%
2020not published2,0066,29633,7673,33610.159.410.161%
2019not published1,1793,68616,2491,8588.772.67.6885%
2018not published1,1453,58414,4621,26511.479.17.56–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.12.37.90+55%2,983 of 3,611Bureau VeritasB+C
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.2.928.09−64%25 of 3,089Bureau VeritasB+C
2023not published9.138.27+10%2,090 of 3,548Bureau VeritasC
2022not published8.028.71−8%1,643 of 3,968Bureau VeritasC
2021not published7.198.57−16%1,088 of 3,466Bureau VeritasC
2020not published10.18.24+23%2,192 of 3,150Bureau VeritasC
2019not published7.688.38−8%1,384 of 3,360Bureau VeritasC
2018not published7.568.50−11%1,303 of 3,384Bureau Veritas–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.