Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE

IMO: 9809825
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,814 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,664 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

176

Container median 178 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+18%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

70.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,948 t

CO₂ emitted

50,365 t

Distance sailed

90,475 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,411 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 165 kg/nm · median 177 (−7%)

78.8Ranks 1,029 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+28%)

7.22Ranks 1,380 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports79%
From the EU7%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

15,230 t

96% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,302 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE
Container median

140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+3%	−0%	+6%	−7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−7%	−5%	−6%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−2%	+6%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	+4%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+11%	+9%	−2%	+51%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+5%	+6%	−8%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,476	29,645	56,773	3,463	16.4	167	20.4	95%
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	14,613	45,709	88,392	5,499	16.1	165	20.8	94%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13,428	42,038	83,395	5,028	16.6	161	22.5	94%
2023	not published	15,438	48,306	89,058	5,504	16.2	173	23.9	93%
2022	not published	15,948	50,365	90,475	5,411	16.7	176	22.6	96%
2021	not published	14,961	47,253	87,363	5,208	16.8	171	24.2	95%
2020	not published	13,779	43,517	89,017	5,208	17.1	155	16.0	100%
2019	not published	14,235	44,574	96,658	5,704	16.9	147	15.2	95%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	20.8	16.3	+28%	1,380 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	22.5	17.5	+28%	1,242 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	23.9	19.4	+23%	1,149 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	22.6	19.1	+18%	1,060 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	24.2	17.9	+35%	1,161 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.0	17.6	−9%	791 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.2	18.9	−19%	671 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.