Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBHyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 13 |
| CO₂ emitted | 282 kt+428.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 130 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 4 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH20.8 (+28% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH | 13 | 20.8 | +28% | 130 | 12.9 | 4,203 | 7.5% | 4 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH | ABS (13) | 31% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS | 9239874 | Container | 36.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +65% | 6.5 | 2,982 t | €84k |
| CMA CGM NEVA | 9745548 | Container | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +62% | 15.0 | 12,941 t | €273k |
| CMA CGM PREGOLIA | 9745500 | Container | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +58% | 15.2 | 9,905 t | €287k |
| CMA CGM MERMAIDLNG | 9961283 | Container | 23.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +6% | 10.8 | 14,414 t | €757k |
| CMA CGM TIVOLILNG | 9961312 | Container | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −1% | 12.6 | 15,152 t | €796k |
| CMA CGM LOUGA | 9745550 | Container | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −1% | 9.0 | 12,526 t | €69k |
| CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE | 9809825 | Container | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −6% | 16.1 | 45,709 t | €102k |
| CMA CGM FORT ROYAL | 9809837 | Container | 20.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −9% | 15.1 | 43,781 t | €121k |
| CMA CGM FORT SAINT CHARLES | 9809849 | Container | 20.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −10% | 16.3 | 45,645 t | €144k |
| CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE | 9809851 | Container | 19.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −11% | 16.1 | 44,165 t | €74k |
| CMA CGM ERMITAGELNG | 9961295 | Container | 19.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −14% | 11.8 | 12,165 t | €464k |
| CMA CGM SALAMANQUE | 9961348 | Container | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −17% | 6.3 | 9,169 t | €382k |
| CMA CGM RUNDALELNG | 9961300 | Container | 16.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −24% | 12.4 | 13,293 t | €503k |
30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.