Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT ROYAL

IMO: 9809837
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,586 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,785 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Container median 172 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−9%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,675 t

CO₂ emitted

43,265 t

Distance sailed

90,730 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,498 h

229 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 177 (−10%)

78.8Ranks 985 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 78% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+24%)

7.22Ranks 1,351 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU4%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

13,675 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,042 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−5%	−14%	+7%	−9%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−1%	+4%	−8%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	+3%	+1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+8%	+8%	+2%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	−6%	+42%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+7%	+17%	+62%	+5%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	7,644	23,893	48,568	3,096	15.7	157	19.8	95%
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	14,007	43,781	88,242	5,846	15.1	159	20.2	95%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13,824	43,219	82,642	4,960	16.7	167	22.3	95%
2023	not published	15,302	47,866	90,129	5,699	15.8	170	23.2	95%
2022	not published	15,435	48,741	87,877	5,200	16.9	176	23.0	95%
2021	not published	13,986	44,172	85,734	5,088	16.9	163	22.8	96%
2020	not published	13,675	43,265	90,730	5,498	16.5	151	16.0	100%
2019	not published	7,878	24,661	56,039	3,691	15.2	141	15.3	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	20.2	16.3	+24%	1,351 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	22.3	17.5	+27%	1,236 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	23.2	19.4	+19%	1,124 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	23.0	19.1	+20%	1,079 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	22.8	17.9	+27%	1,110 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.0	17.6	−9%	792 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.3	18.9	−19%	676 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.