Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE

IMO: 9809851
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,323 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,323 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

159.0 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.63

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+20%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,124 t

CO₂ emitted

44,165 t

44,858 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

88,845 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,506 h

229 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 159.0 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−10%)

78.8Ranks 987 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.63 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+20%)

7.22Ranks 1,325 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports77%
From the EU8%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU5%

3% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,405 t).

Fuel burned laden

95%

5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−0%	−5%	+2%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−5%	+2%	−2%	−8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−15%	−21%	+1%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+15%	+13%	−3%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+13%	+22%	+3%	+48%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+2%	+11%	+123%	+9%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,990	31,247	62,431	3,737	16.7	160.0	19.49	95%
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	14,124	44,165	88,845	5,506	16.1	159.0	19.63	95%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13,821	43,209	86,803	5,110	17.0	159.2	21.10	95%
2023	not published	14,858	46,449	88,680	5,601	15.8	167.6	22.96	94%
2022	not published	17,322	54,687	88,025	5,162	17.1	196.8	25.19	95%
2021	not published	15,588	49,224	90,924	5,235	17.4	171.4	23.78	96%
2020	not published	13,298	41,998	88,004	5,438	16.2	151.1	16.09	100%
2019	not published	5,844	18,289	39,440	2,650	14.9	148.2	14.77	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	19.63	16.30	+20%	1,325 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	21.10	17.52	+20%	1,186 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	22.96	19.40	+18%	1,117 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	25.19	19.13	+32%	1,152 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	23.78	17.90	+33%	1,147 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.09	17.58	−8%	798 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.77	18.88	−22%	638 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.