Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE

IMO: 9809851
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,323 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,766 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

171

Container median 186 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+33%)

Average speed

17.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,588 t

CO₂ emitted

49,224 t

Distance sailed

90,924 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,235 h

218 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 177 (−10%)

78.8Ranks 987 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+20%)

7.22Ranks 1,325 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports81%
From the EU6%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

14,918 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,161 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−0%	−5%	+2%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−5%	+2%	−2%	−8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−15%	−21%	+1%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+15%	+13%	−3%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+13%	+22%	+3%	+48%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+2%	+11%	+123%	+9%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,990	31,247	62,431	3,737	16.7	160	19.5	95%
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	14,124	44,165	88,845	5,506	16.1	159	19.6	95%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13,821	43,209	86,803	5,110	17.0	159	21.1	95%
2023	not published	14,858	46,449	88,680	5,601	15.8	168	23.0	94%
2022	not published	17,322	54,687	88,025	5,162	17.1	197	25.2	95%
2021	not published	15,588	49,224	90,924	5,235	17.4	171	23.8	96%
2020	not published	13,298	41,998	88,004	5,438	16.2	151	16.1	100%
2019	not published	5,844	18,289	39,440	2,650	14.9	148	14.8	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA SHIPS GERMANY GMBH	19.6	16.3	+20%	1,325 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	21.1	17.5	+20%	1,186 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	23.0	19.4	+18%	1,117 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	25.2	19.1	+32%	1,152 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	23.8	17.9	+33%	1,147 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.1	17.6	−8%	798 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.8	18.9	−22%	638 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.