Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HAFNIA PACIFIC

IMO: 9810226
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 36,286 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WISBY PACIFIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management Pte Ltd · part of BW Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,474 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.2

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+35%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,363 t

CO₂ emitted

10,527 t

Distance sailed

33,902 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,122 h

130 days, 36% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.0 kg/nm · median 129 (−25%)

76.1Ranks 391 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.7 (+3%)

8.0Faster than 59% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+6%)

4.51Ranks 906 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU27%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

513 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HAFNIA PACIFIC
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAFNIA PACIFIC
Oil tanker median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAFNIA PACIFIC
Oil tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+14%	+9%	−52%	−13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−19%	−13%	+45%	+8%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+0%	−1%	+97%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+17%	+10%	−25%	+6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−10%	−4%	−50%	−19%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+27%	+14%	+156%	+45%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−16%	−16%	−62%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BW Fleet Management Pte Ltd	1,716	5,391	17,688	1,603	11.0	97.0	8.40	–
2024	BW Fleet Management Pte Ltd	3,100	9,730	36,493	3,158	11.6	85.0	9.66	–
2023	not published	2,634	8,265	25,179	2,334	10.8	105	8.94	–
2022	not published	1,333	4,185	12,752	1,170	10.9	105	10.4	–
2021	not published	1,511	4,731	16,979	1,459	11.6	89.0	9.87	–
2020	not published	3,363	10,527	33,902	3,122	10.9	99.2	12.2	–
2019	not published	1,036	3,257	13,226	1,095	12.1	78.3	8.41	–
2018	not published	3,228	10,105	34,483	2,865	12.0	93.6	9.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BW Fleet Management Pte Ltd	8.40	7.95	+6%	906 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	BW Fleet Management Pte Ltd	9.66	8.06	+20%	1,131 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	8.94	8.44	+6%	978 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	10.4	8.51	+23%	1,249 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	9.87	8.86	+11%	1,032 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	12.2	9.03	+35%	1,264 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	8.41	17.3	−51%	74 of 1,321	Verifavia	A+B+C
2018	not published	9.07	17.1	−47%	110 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.