Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VIKING GLORY

IMO
9827877
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Finland
Port of registry
Mariehamn
Technical efficiency
EIV 3.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA Super
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VIKING LINE Abp

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
152
Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−4%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
71.5
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−89%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
294
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+16%)
Average speed
15.7 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
57.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
16,070 t
CO₂ emitted
48,798 t
Distance sailed
105,999 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,761 h
282 days, 77% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 128 kg/nm · median 150 (−15%)
69.3Ranks 132 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)
12.0Faster than 47% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 66.7 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−88%)
66.8Ranks 41 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 186 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−27%)
48.6Ranks 166 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports93%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,118 t
6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VIKING GLORY
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VIKING GLORY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VIKING GLORY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VIKING GLORY
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn+1%+1%+1%+3%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024−0.1 kn+2%+1%−1%+6%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.0 kn−18%−18%+12%−14%Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGVIKING LINE Abp15,33042,584119,3447,65915.6128––
2024LNGVIKING LINE AB14,93639,573117,6127,52115.6127––
2023LNG / alt.not published14,80641,315118,9997,55715.7124––
2022not published16,07048,798105,9996,76115.7152––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025LNGVIKING LINE Abp66.7567−88%41 of 408186253−27%VerifaviaC
2024LNGVIKING LINE AB65.0547−88%44 of 404210233−10%VerifaviaC
2023LNG / alt.not published61.5680−91%32 of 386211234−10%VerifaviaC
2022not published71.5626−89%40 of 394294253+16%VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.