Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

COPENHAGEN BULKER

IMO: 9831490
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 29,252 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORD ANNAPOLIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,489 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.6

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.91

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (−21%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

901 t

CO₂ emitted

2,816 t

Distance sailed

12,943 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,077 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−5%)

61.0Ranks 1,481 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+6%)

4.80Ranks 2,044 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU68%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

866 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

71 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COPENHAGEN BULKER
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COPENHAGEN BULKER
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COPENHAGEN BULKER
Bulk carrier median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+14%	+2%	+152%	−3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.7 kn	−1%	−7%	−22%	+26%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−3%	+0%	−7%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+3%	+10%	−21%	+13%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−26%	+15%	+40%	−26%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.0 kn	+47%	−15%	+8%	+44%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 47%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	1,995	6,265	25,468	2,509	10.2	78.3	8.41	88%
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	695	2,165	10,110	893	11.3	68.8	8.70	100%
2022	not published	901	2,816	12,943	1,077	12.0	69.6	6.91	96%
2021	not published	1,002	3,139	13,965	1,198	11.7	71.7	7.77	89%
2020	not published	1,231	3,869	17,618	1,613	10.9	69.9	6.86	87%
2019	not published	1,195	3,765	12,606	1,803	7.0	94.8	9.25	86%
2018	not published	752	2,349	11,627	972	12.0	64.7	6.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	8.41	7.90	+6%	2,044 of 3,611	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	8.70	8.09	+8%	1,767 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022	not published	6.91	8.71	−21%	1,119 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	7.77	8.57	−9%	1,355 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	6.86	8.24	−17%	999 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	9.25	8.38	+10%	2,013 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	6.41	8.50	−25%	788 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.