Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BAI IZMIR

IMO: 9855410
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 31,155 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WESTERN MOSCOW

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,334 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.0

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+24%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,263 t

CO₂ emitted

7,069 t

Distance sailed

32,325 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,095 h

129 days, 35% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−15%)

61.0Ranks 881 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−10%)

4.80Ranks 1,408 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU35%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,663 t

74% of all fuel; 27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

243 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAI IZMIR
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAI IZMIR
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BAI IZMIR
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	−28%	−19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−13%	−20%	+163%	−32%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+22%	+26%	−48%	+22%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−24%	−22%	+177%	+18%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+27%	+31%	−77%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−6%	−3%	+177%	+32%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	1,447	4,545	20,606	2,038	10.1	70.2	7.08	83%
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	2,053	6,430	28,663	2,728	10.5	71.6	8.69	78%
2023	not published	898	2,817	10,886	960	11.3	82.5	12.9	97%
2022	not published	1,423	4,452	21,015	1,911	11.0	67.7	10.5	57%
2021	not published	675	2,121	7,574	705	10.7	89.2	8.95	88%
2020	not published	2,263	7,069	32,325	3,095	10.4	70.0	10.3	74%
2019	not published	869	2,736	11,680	1,154	10.1	74.4	7.77	83%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	7.08	7.90	−10%	1,408 of 3,611	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	8.69	8.09	+7%	1,761 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	12.9	8.27	+56%	2,877 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	10.5	8.71	+21%	2,643 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	8.95	8.57	+4%	1,892 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	10.3	8.24	+24%	2,214 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	7.77	8.38	−7%	1,441 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.