Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM SCANDOLA

IMO: 9859129
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 90,445 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.46 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD. · part of Eastern Pacific Shipping

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 117,427 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

291

Container median 186 kg/nm (+57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−60%)

Average speed

18.1 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

126.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,640 t

CO₂ emitted

39,604 t

Distance sailed

46,907 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,591 h

108 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 234 kg/nm · median 177 (+32%)

78.8Ranks 1,524 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 84% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−55%)

7.22Ranks 252 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU9%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

12,262 t

90% of all fuel; 10% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4,000 t

10.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM SCANDOLA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM SCANDOLA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM SCANDOLA
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−7%	−19%	+4%	+8%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−2%	+7%	+214%	+3%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−17%	−20%	−20%	−15%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+6%	−1%	−36%	+9%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	18,288	52,457	78,270	5,024	15.6	234	7.41	98%
2024LNG	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	19,038	54,632	75,449	4,231	17.8	252	6.89	98%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,182	18,059	24,045	1,476	16.3	257	6.71	94%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,320	27,430	30,154	1,786	16.9	309	7.87	90%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,640	39,604	46,907	2,591	18.1	291	7.19	90%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	7.41	16.3	−55%	252 of 2,208	ABS	A+B
2024LNG	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	6.89	17.5	−61%	140 of 1,974	ABS	A+B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.71	19.4	−65%	123 of 1,899	ABS	A
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.87	19.1	−59%	208 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.19	17.9	−60%	153 of 1,781	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.