Navalyze · Container · Ship

HMM GDANSK

IMO: 9863326
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 181,569 t
Flag (estimated): Panama (from the 2022 report)
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HMM Company Limited · part of HMM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 172,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

287

Container median 165 kg/nm (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.20

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−73%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

81.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,285 t

CO₂ emitted

53,838 t

Distance sailed

60,138 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,099 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 295 kg/nm · median 177 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,950 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 13.3 (−34%)

9.1Faster than 9% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−69%)

7.22Ranks 9 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU5%
Into the EU88%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,141 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HMM GDANSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HMM GDANSK
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HMM GDANSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.1 kn	−0%	−32%	−44%	−14%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+3%	+13%	−0%	+12%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−14%	−11%	+99%	−19%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+14%	+4%	−10%	+14%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	−12%	−32%	−3%	−10%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HMM Company Limited	9,967	30,957	33,829	3,841	8.8	295	5.04	–
2024	HMM Company Limited	17,706	55,140	59,883	4,626	12.9	296	5.84	–
2023	not published	17,285	53,838	60,138	5,099	11.8	287	5.20	–
2022	not published	10,087	31,414	30,293	2,652	11.4	333	6.42	–
2021	not published	9,808	30,552	33,518	2,677	12.5	293	5.65	–
2020	not published	11,446	35,643	34,603	2,139	16.2	331	6.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HMM Company Limited	5.04	16.3	−69%	9 of 2,208	Korean Register	B+C
2024	HMM Company Limited	5.84	17.5	−67%	53 of 1,974	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	5.20	19.4	−73%	15 of 1,899	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	6.42	19.1	−66%	77 of 1,825	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	5.65	17.9	−68%	28 of 1,781	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	6.25	17.6	−64%	101 of 1,797	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.