Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

HMMyour view

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

	HMM
Ships	53
CO₂ emitted	920 kt−10.5%
Fuel per mile	228 kg/nm
Average speed	11.7 kn
CO₂ at berth	3.9%
Ships burning LNG	2
Main segment	Container

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

HMM7.5 (−54% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
HMM	41	7.5	−54%	238	11.8	2,585	3.6%	2
Segment median		16.3	0%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

HMM5.5 (−30% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
HMM	6	5.5	−30%	181	11.2	1,202	8.6%	–
Segment median		8.0	0%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

HMM7.2 (−9% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
HMM	4	7.2	−9%	89	9.2	1,104	4.5%	–
Segment median		7.9	0%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

HMM23.1 (−35% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
HMM	1	23.1	−35%	83	12.4	1,704	7.1%	–
Segment median		35.6	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
HMM	Korean Register (51), Lloyd's Register (2)	0%	47%	91%	0%

HMM: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
HERCULES I	9723124	Oil tanker	6.4 g CO₂/t·nm	4.6	+39%	12.4	7,485 t	€221k
VL BRILLIANT	9683673	Oil tanker	10.6 g CO₂/t·nm	8.2	+29%	11.2	4,323 t	€123k
HMM LE HAVRE	9868314	Container	8.9 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	+26%	12.8	27,000 t	€809k
VL PRIME	9683685	Oil tanker	5.5 g CO₂/t·nm	4.6	+19%	10.9	7,765 t	€227k
HMM TACOMA	9385001	Container	16.6 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	+15%	12.9	40,259 t	€1.1m
HYUNDAI BRAVE	9346304	Container	11.6 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+13%	14.2	16,966 t	€506k
HMM DRIVE	9637246	Container	11.4 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+11%	12.6	1,086 t	€32k
GUADALUPE EXPLORER	9926934	Gas carrier (LPG)	23.1 g CO₂/t·nm	20.9	+10%	12.4	5,370 t	€151k
HMM HANBADA	9869203	Container	7.7 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	+8%	12.6	11,020 t	€0
HMM PRIDE	9637260	Container	10.9 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+6%	13.6	17,210 t	€419k
HMM RAON	9869215	Container	7.5 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	+6%	11.9	27,830 t	€620k
HMM AQUAMARINE	9944479	Container	15.1 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	+5%	5.6	3,530 t	€155k
HMM JAKARTA	9323522	Container	15.0 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	+4%	12.5	18,130 t	€549k
HYUNDAI COURAGE	9347542	Container	10.6 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+2%	13.2	41,809 t	€1.3m
ATLANTIC BONANZA	9952505	Bulk carrier	6.6 g CO₂/t·nm	6.6	0%	10.6	1,815 t	€0
HMM PLATINUM	9637155	Container	14.2 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	−1%	12.2	6,831 t	€0
HMM HOPE	9637234	Container	10.2 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	−2%	14.8	16,028 t	€405k
HMM SOUTHAMPTON	9868340	Container	6.6 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−7%	11.4	37,420 t	€1.2m
HMM DREAM	9637222	Container	6.6 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−7%	12.3	18,049 t	€539k
HMM OAKLAND	9385013	Container	13.3 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	−8%	13.4	35,699 t	€966k
PACIFIC DIVA	9883106	Bulk carrier	14.1 g CO₂/t·nm	15.5	−9%	8.0	5,485 t	€0
HMM GARAM	9869186	Container	6.4 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−10%	6.4	3,709 t	€0
UNIVERSAL PARTNER	9837614	Oil tanker	4.1 g CO₂/t·nm	4.6	−11%	7.2	4,744 t	€143k
POLAR ACE	9721504	Oil tanker	5.5 g CO₂/t·nm	6.3	−12%	12.1	13,936 t	€388k
HMM STOCKHOLM	9868352	Container	6.0 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−16%	12.7	37,239 t	€1.1m
PACIFIC APEX	9916226	Bulk carrier	7.8 g CO₂/t·nm	9.5	−18%	11.7	1,037 t	€0
GLOBAL BRIGHT	9714240	Bulk carrier	3.9 g CO₂/t·nm	4.8	−19%	11.9	3,002 t	€0
HMM OSLO	9868326	Container	5.7 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−19%	13.3	41,929 t	€1.2m
HMM COLOMBO	9323508	Container	11.6 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	−19%	13.9	22,500 t	€569k
HMM NURI	9869162	Container	5.7 g CO₂/t·nm	7.1	−20%	8.9	10,295 t	€0

30 of 57 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.