Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

HMM GARAM

IMO
9869186
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
114,160 t
Flag (estimated)
South Korea
Port of registry
Jeju
Technical efficiency
EEDI 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd · part of HMM

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 114,640 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
223
Container median 165 kg/nm (+35%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
6.08
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−69%)
Average speed
13.2 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (+0%)
Fuel per day at sea
70.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,038 t
CO₂ emitted
37,568 t
Distance sailed
53,899 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,078 h
170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 233 kg/nm · median 177 (+32%)
78.8Ranks 1,519 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 6.4 kn · median 13.3 (−52%)
9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−61%)
7.22Ranks 104 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports12%
  • From the EU32%
  • Into the EU52%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,484 t
4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • HMM GARAM
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • HMM GARAM
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • HMM GARAM
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−6.0 kn+6%−46%−92%+8%6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.8 kn−1%−7%+14%−3%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.8 kn+1%+8%+50%−4%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+1.3 kn+3%+16%−6%+10%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearHMM Ocean Service Co Ltd1,1843,7095,0847986.42336.39–
2025HMM Company Limited1,1843,7095,0847986.42336.39–
2024HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd13,51342,13361,3384,93412.42205.92–
2023not published12,03837,56853,8994,07813.22236.08–
2022not published7,93924,79935,9252,89112.42216.31–
2021not published8,21125,60438,3143,46011.12145.74–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearHMM Ocean Service Co Ltd––––Korean RegisterC
2025HMM Company Limited6.3916.3−61%104 of 2,208Korean RegisterB+C
2024HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd5.9217.5−66%57 of 1,974Korean RegisterC
2023not published6.0819.4−69%66 of 1,899Korean RegisterC
2022not published6.3119.1−67%60 of 1,825Korean RegisterC
2021not published5.7417.9−68%36 of 1,781Korean RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.