Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BAJAMAR EXPRESS

IMO: 9874296
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Las Palmas De Gran Canaria

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

162

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,149

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

992

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+339%)

Average speed

27.2 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+68%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,271 t

CO₂ emitted

39,340 t

Distance sailed

75,969 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,790 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 167 kg/nm · median 150 (+11%)

69.3Ranks 262 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 25.7 kn · median 15.8 (+63%)

12.0Faster than 94% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,150 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+103%)

66.8Ranks 325 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 887 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+250%)

48.6Ranks 331 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

669 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAJAMAR EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

140.0150.0160.0170.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAJAMAR EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BAJAMAR EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BAJAMAR EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	+2%	+14%	+4%	+19%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.4 kn	−2%	−14%	−5%	−8%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+1%	−1%	+11%	−8%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+1%	+1%	+10%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	+12%	+25%	+113%	−21%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	15,286	49,005	91,599	3,569	25.7	167	–	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	14,357	46,030	88,122	3,817	23.1	163	–	–
2023	not published	15,382	49,316	92,885	3,512	26.5	166	–	–
2022	not published	13,674	43,837	83,462	3,087	27.0	164	–	–
2021	not published	12,271	39,340	75,969	2,790	27.2	162	–	–
2020	not published	5,156	16,532	35,679	1,472	24.2	145	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	1,150	567	+103%	325 of 408	887	253	+250%	DNV	A
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	970	547	+77%	285 of 404	932	233	+300%	DNV	A
2023	not published	1,058	680	+56%	287 of 386	949	234	+306%	DNV	A
2022	not published	1,149	626	+84%	302 of 394	1,032	253	+308%	DNV	A
2021	not published	1,149	815	+41%	257 of 377	992	226	+339%	DNV	A
2020	not published	1,450	751	+93%	282 of 387	1,133	217	+421%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.