Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

DIAMOND GAS VICTORIA

IMO
9874466
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd · part of NYK

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
178
LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−29%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.83
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−34%)
Average speed
13.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−3%)
Fuel per day at sea
58.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,887 t
CO₂ emitted
22,215 t
Distance sailed
44,208 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,232 h
135 days, 37% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 162 kg/nm · median 205 (−21%)
148Ranks 56 of 312, lowest first328
Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.6 (+3%)
11.0Faster than 67% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.94 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−20%)
4.54Ranks 102 of 312, lowest first17.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
633 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • DIAMOND GAS VICTORIA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • DIAMOND GAS VICTORIA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • DIAMOND GAS VICTORIA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024+3.4 kn−13%+13%+93%−23%3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.0 kn+4%−11%−71%+13%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024part-yearLNGNYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd4,03510,95324,8491,64315.1162––
2024LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD4,03510,95324,8491,64315.1162––
2023LNG / alt.not published2,3996,98312,8801,09911.7186––
2022LNG / alt.not published7,88722,21544,2083,23213.7178––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024part-yearLNGNYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd––––ClassNKC
2024LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD5.947.39−20%102 of 312ClassNKB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published7.729.10−15%139 of 355ClassNKA+C
2022LNG / alt.not published6.8310.4−34%82 of 379ClassNKA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.