Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LILAC RAY

IMO: 9883481
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,547,667 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.58 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd · part of MTM Ship Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,547,667 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

62.4 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

0.03

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

10.0 kn

Fuel per day at sea

15.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,705 t

CO₂ emitted

8,520 t

8,653 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,374 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,342 h

181 days, 50% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.4 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−22%)

53.8Ranks 279 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.0 (+2%)

8.7Faster than 55% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (−19%)

8.47Ranks 479 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU45%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU10%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,200 t).

Fuel burned laden

86%

14% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LILAC RAY
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LILAC RAY
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LILAC RAY
Chemical tanker median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−2%	−12%	+43%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−19%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+6%	+7%	−9%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−12%	−19%	+104%	−9%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+10%	+6%	−9%	+15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	2,705	8,520	43,374	4,342	10.0	62.4	0.03	86%
2024	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	1,926	6,085	30,401	2,713	11.2	63.4	13.47	89%
2023	not published	2,447	7,724	37,619	3,333	11.3	65.1	14.39	95%
2022	not published	2,532	8,017	41,349	3,690	11.2	61.2	15.82	73%
2021	not published	1,408	4,463	20,273	1,666	12.2	69.5	17.38	82%
2020	not published	1,407	4,460	22,198	1,762	12.6	63.4	15.08	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2024	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	13.47	16.73	−19%	479 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2023	not published	14.39	16.23	−11%	552 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	15.82	16.06	−1%	683 of 1,409	ABS	A
2021	not published	17.38	16.69	+4%	725 of 1,343	ABS	A
2020	not published	15.08	16.16	−7%	575 of 1,312	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.