BALTIC ENABLER
- IMO
- 9884681
- Type
- Ro-ro ship
- Average cargo carried
- 13,913 t
- Flag (estimated)
- Sweden
- Port of registry
- Gothenburg
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 6.71 g CO₂/t·nm
- Ice class
- IA Super
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wallenius Marine
2023 at a glance
From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,251 t of cargo on average.
Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025
Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2023
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports91%
- From the EU0%
- Into the EU0%
- At berth in the EU9%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- BALTIC ENABLER
- Ro-ro median
Average speed, kn
- BALTIC ENABLER
- Ro-ro median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- BALTIC ENABLER
- Ro-ro median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.6 kn | −3% | +1% | +2% | −6% | 0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −0.6 kn | +10% | +6% | −2% | −17% | 0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | +0.9 kn | +14% | +22% | +121% | −2% | 0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change. |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Wallenius Marine | 12,307 | 36,568 | 87,091 | 5,908 | 14.7 | 141 | 30.2 | – |
| 2024LNG | Wallenius Marine AB | 12,453 | 35,923 | 85,251 | 6,062 | 14.1 | 146 | 32.1 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 11,557 | 34,768 | 87,329 | 5,936 | 14.7 | 132 | 38.8 | – |
| 2022 | not published | 4,580 | 14,543 | 39,571 | 2,871 | 13.8 | 116 | 39.8 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Ro-ro median | vs Ro-ro | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Wallenius Marine | 30.2 | 95.2 | −68% | 3 of 235 | DNV | C |
| 2024LNG | Wallenius Marine AB | 32.1 | 97.5 | −67% | 3 of 220 | DNV | C |
| 2023 | not published | 38.8 | 109 | −64% | 5 of 221 | DNV | C |
| 2022 | not published | 39.8 | 90.6 | −56% | 4 of 223 | Lloyd's Register | C |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.