Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION
Ships9
CO₂ emitted41 kt
Fuel per mile107 kg/nm
Average speed11.0 kn
CO₂ at berth7.1%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION9.0 (−46%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION79.0−46%9112.11,0096.8%–
Segment median 16.70%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION8.3 (+3%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION28.3+3%1449.11,9887.5%–
Segment median 8.10%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATIONABS (9)100%0%100%0%

FORMOSA PLASTICS MARINE CORPORATION: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
FPMC 319831696Chemical tanker11.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+37%11.72,944 t€64k
FPMC 309581679Chemical tanker10.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+16%11.03,259 t€61k
FPMC 299581667Chemical tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+7%12.43,444 t€53k
FPMC 359845178Chemical tanker9.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+5%12.73,265 t€53k
FPMC P IDEAL9459709Oil tanker8.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+4%9.111,970 t€191k
FPMC 349845166Chemical tanker8.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.60%11.84,751 t€91k
FPMC P HERO9457610Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−6%9.14,361 t€75k
FPMC 369845180Chemical tanker7.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.6−9%12.84,340 t€76k
FPMC 329831701Chemical tanker6.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.6−25%12.02,442 t€41k

30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.