Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

KLCSM CO., LTD.
Ships10
CO₂ emitted125 kt
Fuel per mile151 kg/nm
Average speed12.6 kn
CO₂ at berth3.2%
Ships burning LNG4
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • KLCSM CO., LTD.5.7 (−23%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
KLCSM CO., LTD.45.7−23%16213.83,3982.6%4
Segment median 7.40%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • KLCSM CO., LTD.6.3 (−22%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
KLCSM CO., LTD.66.3−22%12510.51,9874.2%–
Segment median 8.10%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
KLCSM CO., LTD.Korean Register (10)0%0%100%0%

KLCSM CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
K. LOTUSLNG9901362LNG carrier38.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+421%8.46,750 t€203k
SM ROBERTS BANK9842504Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.1+9%10.28,228 t€132k
SM SANTOS9842516Bulk carrier4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+1%10.88,563 t€133k
SM SAMCHEONPO9842487Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.1−5%11.41,257 t€20k
SM BLUEBIRDLNG9902914LNG carrier6.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−19%15.910,421 t€159k
SM GEMINI19841586Bulk carrier3.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.9−24%10.314,481 t€235k
SM ALBATROSSLNG9902902LNG carrier5.4 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−27%15.037,280 t€570k
SM KESTRELLNG9917579LNG carrier5.2 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−30%15.128,225 t€441k

30 of 10 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.