Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- KLCSM CO., LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 10 |
| CO₂ emitted | 80 kt−36.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 136 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- KLCSM CO., LTD.5.2 (−34% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | 6 | 5.2 | −34% | 126 | 10.1 | 1,487 | 3.4% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- KLCSM CO., LTD.26.0 (+265% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | 2 | 26.0 | +265% | 148 | 10.9 | 3,041 | 6.8% | 2 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- KLCSM CO., LTD.54.9 (+237% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | 1 | 54.9 | +237% | 161 | 12.8 | 2,346 | 0.7% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- KLCSM CO., LTD.6.7 (−55% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | 1 | 6.7 | −55% | 78 | 11.4 | 971 | 4.4% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLCSM CO., LTD. | Korean Register (10) | 10% | 10% | 100% | 0% |
KLCSM CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. LOTUSLNG | 9901362 | LNG carrier | 46.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +554% | 7.0 | 6,051 t | €306k |
| SM SAMCHEONPO | 9842487 | Bulk carrier | 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +23% | 9.5 | 2,132 t | €58k |
| SM SEOUL | 9456953 | Container | 54.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +23% | 12.8 | 15,069 t | €210k |
| SM NEW ORLEANS | 9842499 | Bulk carrier | 5.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +14% | 9.7 | 6,742 t | €182k |
| SM HARMONY1 | 9842528 | Bulk carrier | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +12% | 10.0 | 6,358 t | €183k |
| OCEAN ROAD | 9503201 | Bulk carrier | 5.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +3% | 11.1 | 4,466 t | €121k |
| SM SANTOS | 9842516 | Bulk carrier | 4.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −4% | 10.6 | 1,862 t | €57k |
| GIANT ACE | 9501851 | Bulk carrier | 4.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −17% | 10.2 | 13,781 t | €434k |
| SM OSPREY | 9786231 | Chemical tanker | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −18% | 11.4 | 2,712 t | €79k |
| SM KESTRELLNG | 9917579 | LNG carrier | 5.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −23% | 14.9 | 20,592 t | €557k |
30 of 10 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.