Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.
Ships8
CO₂ emitted28 kt
Fuel per mile46 kg/nm
Average speed10.0 kn
CO₂ at berth13.3%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentGeneral cargo

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

  • MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.23.6 (+23%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.323.6+23%3810.34,4635.5%–
Segment median 19.30%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.28.9 (+73%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.528.9+73%689.11,11625.4%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.Bureau Veritas (8)100%0%0%0%

MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
VESTANHAV9504152General cargo27.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+41%11.06,086 t€183k
THUN LIFFEY9829007Chemical tanker30.3 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+28%8.24,052 t€80k
THUN LUNDY9837872Chemical tanker30.2 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+28%9.61,611 t€32k
KALKVIK9341172General cargo23.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+23%10.16,596 t€172k
THUN LIVERPOOL9828998Chemical tanker28.9 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+22%10.02,250 t€46k
THUN LIDKOPING9828974Chemical tanker28.1 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+19%10.12,043 t€48k
SUNNANHAV9341160General cargo22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+15%9.84,247 t€111k
THUN LONDON9828986Chemical tanker23.4 g CO₂/t·nm23.7−1%9.01,010 t€21k

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.