Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Capital Maritime Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Capital Maritime Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 56 |
| CO₂ emitted | 346 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 167 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 8 |
| Main segment | Gas carrier (LPG) |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- Capital Maritime Group13.8 (−62% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 11 | 13.8 | −62% | 189 | 14.5 | 2,944 | 1.9% | 8 |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Capital Maritime Group4.0 (−51% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 15 | 4.0 | −51% | 181 | 11.1 | 1,876 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Capital Maritime Group18.4 (+5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 24 | 18.4 | +5% | 94 | 12.7 | 1,511 | 2.5% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Capital Maritime Group9.9 (−41% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 4 | 9.9 | −41% | 75 | 10.9 | 1,283 | 4.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | Lloyd's Register (56) | 0% | 5% | 5% | 0% |
Capital Maritime Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARISTIDIS ILNG | 9862906 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +60% | 12.7 | 7,974 t | €122k |
| ARISTOS ILNG | 9862891 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 20.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +36% | 13.8 | 9,950 t | €151k |
| ATTALOSLNG | 9862920 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +27% | 12.3 | 10,038 t | €196k |
| ACHILLEAS | 9398072 | Oil tanker | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +1% | 11.8 | 15,111 t | €239k |
| AMFITRION | 9724623 | Chemical tanker | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −1% | 11.1 | 3,480 t | €54k |
| AITOLOS | 9867619 | Oil tanker | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | −3% | 9.7 | 12,467 t | €196k |
| PIS RINJANI | 9792864 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −5% | 11.7 | 12,914 t | €206k |
| ADAMASTOSLNG | 9879698 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 13.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −7% | 15.5 | 63,630 t | €974k |
| AMPHION | 9830795 | Oil tanker | 4.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −9% | 11.7 | 12,448 t | €192k |
| ARISTARCHOSLNG | 9862918 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 13.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −9% | 14.7 | 17,099 t | €260k |
| AXIOS IILNG | 9943853 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −11% | 13.8 | 44,236 t | €677k |
| ASKLIPIOSLNG | 9884021 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −15% | 15.6 | 14,781 t | €224k |
| ALTEREGO | 9926697 | Oil tanker | 3.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −15% | 9.6 | 7,929 t | €175k |
| ASTERIX ILNG | 9892298 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 12.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −19% | 14.8 | 9,055 t | €138k |
| AGITOS | 9830824 | Oil tanker | 3.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −22% | 12.0 | 12,312 t | €192k |
| ACHELOOS | 9972995 | Container | 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −28% | 13.9 | 10,150 t | €159k |
| ANDRONIKOS | 9830812 | Oil tanker | 3.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −29% | 11.1 | 11,025 t | €171k |
| AVAX | 9953420 | Chemical tanker | 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −32% | 10.8 | 3,164 t | €50k |
| A. OBELIX | 9354674 | Container | 32.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −32% | 11.2 | 10,697 t | €283k |
| ACASTOS | 9973004 | Container | 31.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −33% | 13.6 | 2,285 t | €48k |
| HYUNDAI PLATINUM | 9637155 | Container | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | −41% | 13.8 | 3,810 t | €57k |
| AMORE MIO | 9926685 | Oil tanker | 2.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −43% | 12.6 | 10,444 t | €165k |
| ASTERIOS | 9951135 | Container | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −61% | 13.0 | 1,380 t | €21k |
30 of 57 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.