Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Capital Maritime Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Capital Maritime Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 50 |
| CO₂ emitted | 322 kt−6.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 154 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 9 |
| Main segment | Gas carrier (LPG) |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Capital Maritime Group14.3 (−60% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 11 | 14.3 | −60% | 189 | 14.6 | 3,143 | 2.0% | 9 |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Capital Maritime Group19.6 (+20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 20 | 19.6 | +20% | 97 | 11.6 | 1,635 | 2.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Capital Maritime Group5.8 (−27% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 15 | 5.8 | −27% | 94 | 11.1 | 1,472 | 6.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Capital Maritime Group6.6 (−56% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | 4 | 6.6 | −56% | 70 | 10.6 | 2,040 | 3.0% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime Group | Lloyd's Register (50) | 0% | 64% | 64% | 0% |
Capital Maritime Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASKLIPIOSLNG | 9884021 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +6% | 14.9 | 34,143 t | €910k |
| APOSTOLOSLNG | 9957737 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +6% | 14.7 | 6,766 t | €182k |
| ATTALOSLNG | 9862920 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +4% | 14.6 | 21,108 t | €567k |
| ADAMASTOSLNG | 9879698 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +2% | 14.6 | 52,801 t | €1.4m |
| ADRASTOS | 9951185 | Container | 22.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +1% | 8.0 | 4,571 t | €166k |
| AMORE MIO ILNG | 9943841 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 14.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | 0% | 15.3 | 38,960 t | €1.0m |
| ARISTIDIS ILNG | 9862906 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 14.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −3% | 14.5 | 6,879 t | €183k |
| ATROTOS | 9953432 | Oil tanker | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | −5% | 10.1 | 4,281 t | €88k |
| ASSOSLNG | 9957725 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −7% | 14.1 | 34,013 t | €917k |
| ARISTARCHOSLNG | 9862918 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −7% | 14.8 | 16,417 t | €439k |
| AIOLOS | 9987031 | Oil tanker | 4.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −8% | 11.3 | 10,612 t | €302k |
| ARGEUS I | 1025485 | Oil tanker | 4.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −8% | 11.5 | 2,796 t | €79k |
| ASTERIX ILNG | 9892298 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 12.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −11% | 12.0 | 5,076 t | €135k |
| AGISILAOS | 9953418 | Chemical tanker | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −19% | 10.6 | 4,790 t | €138k |
| ACHELOOS | 9972995 | Container | 16.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −25% | 13.4 | 20,726 t | €255k |
| A. OBELIX | 9354674 | Container | 33.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | −25% | 8.0 | 157 t | €0 |
| AKRISIOS | 9953456 | Oil tanker | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | −27% | 11.1 | 5,234 t | €141k |
| AISOPOS | 9987029 | Oil tanker | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −28% | 11.1 | 2,895 t | €84k |
| ANIKITOS | 9953444 | Oil tanker | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | −32% | 11.8 | 2,925 t | €79k |
| ANAXAGORAS | 9972983 | Container | 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −33% | 13.7 | 1,482 t | €0 |
| ACASTOS | 9973004 | Container | 14.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −36% | 12.1 | 6,065 t | €0 |
| ASTRAIOS | 9961465 | Container | 23.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | −47% | 9.5 | 1,489 t | €60k |
30 of 67 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.