Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

BENTAYGA CARGO

IMO: 9207883
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 756 t
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Las Palmas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: FINNKRAFT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,111 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

97.2

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

144

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (+32%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,791 t

CO₂ emitted

30,571 t

Distance sailed

100,759 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,960 h

248 days, 68% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 130 kg/nm · median 105 (+24%)

56.6Ranks 175 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

10.9Faster than 54% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 541 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+469%)

47.4Ranks 226 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,180 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	+9%	+33%	−30%	+49%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.8 kn	+23%	−12%	−33%	+153%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	−6%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+0%	−3%	+5%	+14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−3%	−0%	+9%	−9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+0%	−1%	−3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−2%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	6,080	19,112	46,724	3,181	14.7	130	541	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	2,490	7,788	24,166	1,411	17.1	103	148	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	8,013	25,050	67,222	5,551	12.1	119	363	–
2023	not published	9,791	30,571	100,759	5,960	16.9	97.2	144	–
2022	not published	11,161	34,824	107,068	6,325	16.9	104	144	–
2021	not published	10,634	33,180	102,286	5,880	17.4	104	126	–
2020	not published	10,054	31,370	93,856	5,528	17.0	107	139	–
2019	not published	10,400	32,448	97,124	5,687	17.1	107	145	–
2018	not published	10,909	34,042	99,338	5,860	17.0	110	143	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	541	95.2	+469%	226 of 235	DNV	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	363	97.5	+272%	204 of 220	RINA	B
2023	not published	144	109	+32%	142 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	144	90.6	+58%	163 of 223	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	126	104	+22%	141 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	139	103	+35%	153 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	145	90.9	+59%	197 of 271	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	143	91.0	+57%	192 of 260	RINA	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.