Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

BAHIA CARGO

IMO: 9207895
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 717 t
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Las Palmas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: FINNHAWK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,217 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

101

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

142

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (+56%)

Average speed

17.2 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,102 t

CO₂ emitted

31,517 t

Distance sailed

99,886 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,793 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 130 kg/nm · median 105 (+25%)

56.6Ranks 177 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

10.9Faster than 43% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 568 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+496%)

47.4Ranks 228 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,368 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHIA CARGO
Ro-ro median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHIA CARGO
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BAHIA CARGO
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+26%	+26%	−36%	+378%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	+4%	−13%	−27%	+16%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−4%	−8%	−1%	−19%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+2%	+3%	+10%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−1%	−2%	+5%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−1%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	−1%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	6,786	21,206	52,082	3,723	14.0	130	568	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	7,182	22,395	72,197	4,274	16.9	99.5	104	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	8,332	25,993	80,775	5,749	14.0	103	119	–
2023	not published	10,943	34,115	110,445	6,598	16.7	99.1	103	–
2022	not published	11,556	36,031	111,795	6,427	17.4	103	126	–
2021	not published	10,384	32,378	101,980	5,946	17.2	102	114	–
2020	not published	10,051	31,343	97,291	5,668	17.2	103	133	–
2019	not published	9,830	30,663	98,410	5,756	17.1	99.9	134	–
2018	not published	10,102	31,517	99,886	5,793	17.2	101	142	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	568	95.2	+496%	228 of 235	DNV	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	119	97.5	+22%	128 of 220	RINA	B
2023	not published	103	109	−6%	109 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	126	90.6	+39%	146 of 223	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	114	104	+10%	128 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	133	103	+29%	146 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	134	90.9	+47%	187 of 271	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	142	91.0	+56%	191 of 260	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.