Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

OSCAR WILDE

IMO: 9524231
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SPIRIT OF BRITAIN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Matrix Ship Management LTD

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

274

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

482

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

444

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+76%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,971 t

CO₂ emitted

44,792 t

Distance sailed

50,995 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,918 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 244 kg/nm · median 150 (+63%)

69.3Ranks 386 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 30% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 398 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−30%)

66.8Ranks 164 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 379 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+50%)

48.6Ranks 240 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,025 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OSCAR WILDE
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OSCAR WILDE
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

OSCAR WILDE
Ro-pax median

200300400500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

OSCAR WILDE
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,0002,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−8%	−5%	+35%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	+12%	−18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+9%	+5%	−27%	−47%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−24%	−26%	−3%	+33%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	−2%	+73%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+3%	−2%	+5%	−83%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Matrix Ship Management LTD	18,935	59,669	77,470	5,525	14.0	244	–	–
2024part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	4,348	13,699	14,132	1,166	12.1	308	–	–
2024	Matrix Ship Management LTD	15,292	48,185	57,324	4,252	13.5	267	–	–
2022	not published	13,971	44,792	50,995	3,918	13.0	274	–	–
2021	not published	17,592	56,401	70,295	5,173	13.6	250	–	–
2020	not published	23,755	76,158	72,306	5,182	14.0	329	–	–
2019	not published	24,412	78,266	74,104	5,181	14.3	329	–	–
2018	not published	22,432	71,646	70,353	4,686	15.0	319	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Matrix Ship Management LTD	398	567	−30%	164 of 408	379	253	+50%	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Matrix Ship Management LTD	395	547	−28%	165 of 404	405	233	+74%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	482	626	−23%	172 of 394	444	253	+76%	DNV	C
2021	not published	903	815	+11%	198 of 377	330	226	+46%	DNV	C
2020	not published	680	751	−9%	185 of 387	347	217	+60%	DNV	C
2019	not published	394	569	−31%	149 of 394	400	223	+80%	DNV	C
2018	not published	2,316	729	+218%	311 of 361	–	–	–	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.