Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VÆRØY

IMO
9607382
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
TromsØ
Technical efficiency
EIV 52.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
42.5 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−72%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
195
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−66%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1,477
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+483%)
Average speed
16.0 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,046 t
CO₂ emitted
8,199 t
10,449 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
71,747 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,486 h
187 days, 51% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.5 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−72%)
69.3Ranks 17 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 15.8 (+1%)
12.0Faster than 53% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 195.11 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−66%)
66.76Ranks 119 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,476.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+483%)
48.59Ranks 373 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports99%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU1%

88% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,218 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
77.2 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.274
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VÆRØY
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VÆRØY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VÆRØY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VÆRØY
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.1 kn−2%−2%+4%+62%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024+0.3 kn+3%+4%+1%−19%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.6 kn−8%−4%+13%−14%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.0 kn+13%+14%−7%−12%Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.5 kn−14%−17%+36%−24%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.7 kn+8%+13%−19%+41%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGTorghatten Nord AS3,0468,19971,7474,48616.042.5––
2024LNGTorghatten Nord AS2,9878,05268,9774,28916.143.3––
2023LNGnot published2,8747,95168,0504,29915.842.2––
2022LNGnot published2,7677,66460,4883,96815.245.7––
2021LNGnot published2,6167,23564,8174,26815.240.4––
2020LNGnot published2,2426,26547,6903,03515.747.0––
2019LNGnot published2,5777,14359,1783,94415.043.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025LNGTorghatten Nord AS195.11566.51−66%119 of 4081,476.81253.18+483%DNVA
2024LNGTorghatten Nord AS120.72546.68−78%95 of 4041,660.41232.85+613%DNVB
2023LNGnot published148.99680.04−78%77 of 3862,276.39233.94+873%DNVB
2022LNGnot published173.95626.32−72%94 of 3942,541.77252.90+905%DNVB
2021LNGnot published198.64815.19−76%95 of 377544.69226.00+141%DNVB
2020LNGnot published262.37750.91−65%112 of 3872,442.33217.49+1,023%DNVB
2019LNGnot published185.81569.03−67%107 of 3941,595.34222.56+617%DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

VÆRØY (IMO 9607382): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2025 | Navalyze