Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

LØDINGEN

IMO: 9607409
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 66.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

34.8 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−77%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

336

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,302

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+414%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

552 t

CO₂ emitted

1,722 t

1,763 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,881 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,072 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 34.8 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−77%)

69.3Ranks 8 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 36% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 336.28 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−41%)

66.76Ranks 154 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,301.71 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+414%)

48.59Ranks 369 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

25% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (429 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.024

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LØDINGEN
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+31%	+39%	−75%	+117%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−9%	−11%	+27%	−93%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−5%	+1%	+14%	−10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+12%	+21%	−2%	+12%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−8%	−18%	+32%	−7%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	−22%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	552	1,722	15,881	1,072	14.8	34.8	–	–
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	1,706	4,569	64,155	4,625	13.9	26.6	–	–
2023LNG	not published	1,480	4,196	50,491	3,550	14.2	29.3	–	–
2022LNG	not published	1,375	3,928	44,462	3,327	13.4	30.9	–	–
2021LNG	not published	1,252	3,555	45,380	3,652	12.4	27.6	–	–
2020LNG	not published	1,033	2,931	34,412	2,482	13.9	30.0	–	–
2019LNG	not published	1,298	3,664	44,317	3,206	13.8	29.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	336.28	566.51	−41%	154 of 408	1,301.71	253.18	+414%	DNV	A
2024LNG	Torghatten Nord AS	155.15	546.68	−72%	112 of 404	1,061.49	232.85	+356%	DNV	B
2023LNG	not published	2,297.89	680.04	+238%	363 of 386	1,330.32	233.94	+469%	DNV	B
2022LNG	not published	2,544.14	626.32	+306%	379 of 394	1,442.31	252.90	+470%	DNV	B
2021LNG	not published	2,269.46	815.19	+178%	341 of 377	901.64	226.00	+299%	DNV	B
2020LNG	not published	2,448.98	750.91	+226%	347 of 387	1,135.87	217.49	+422%	DNV	B
2019LNG	not published	2,291.06	569.03	+303%	369 of 394	1,301.50	222.56	+485%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.