Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PING AN SONG

IMO: 9608946
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Xiamen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.28 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,985 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.6

Other median 90.4 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 72.9 (−84%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Other median 10.1 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

839 t

CO₂ emitted

2,617 t

Distance sailed

10,675 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

836 h

35 days, 10% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,045 general cargo ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.5 kg/nm · median 59.9 (+53%)

36.2Ranks 956 of 1,045, lowest first89.2

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.5 (+2%)

7.5Faster than 56% of general cargo ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 20.7 (−49%)

8.03Ranks 209 of 1,045, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU64%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

87 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PING AN SONG
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PING AN SONG
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PING AN SONG
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	+33%	+15%	+344%	+32%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+0%	+4%	−35%	−23%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	914	2,849	9,987	929	10.7	91.5	15.5	–
2022	not published	155	484	2,249	180	12.5	68.9	44.5	–
2021	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2019	not published	547	1,705	6,948	524	13.3	78.7	19.1	–
2018	not published	839	2,617	10,675	836	12.8	78.6	11.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	10.5	20.7	−49%	209 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	7.89	21.6	−63%	68 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	8.99	25.0	−64%	61 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	11.7	72.9	−84%	5 of 87	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.