Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

XING FU SONG

IMO: 9608958
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Xiamen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.28 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,442 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.0

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

9.25

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−63%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+38%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

494 t

CO₂ emitted

1,541 t

Distance sailed

6,106 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

455 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.8 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+41%)

34.9Ranks 935 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.5 (+9%)

7.8Faster than 72% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 9.49 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (−51%)

7.51Ranks 220 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU73%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

57 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

XING FU SONG
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

XING FU SONG
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

XING FU SONG
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’202020’212021’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	+3.5 kn	+0%	+42%	+806%	−0%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	215	673	2,600	228	11.4	82.8	–	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2021	not published	406	1,264	4,555	391	11.7	89.1	63.7	–
2020	not published	45	140	503	61	8.2	89.1	88.5	–
2019	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2018	not published	494	1,541	6,106	455	13.4	81.0	11.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	9.49	19.3	−51%	220 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	10.2	22.7	−55%	99 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	10.2	24.5	−58%	96 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.25	24.9	−63%	77 of 1,044	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.