Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HAFNIA AZURITE

IMO: 9727560
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,964 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NAVIG8 AZURITE, HAFNIA AZURITE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Thome Croatia d.o.o. · part of OSM Thome

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,964 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

79.2 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+3%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

862 t

CO₂ emitted

2,700 t

2,743 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,878 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

856 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−1%)

52.8Ranks 710 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 11.1 (+14%)

8.8Faster than 94% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+3%)

7.93Ranks 764 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU45%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU8%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,510 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HAFNIA AZURITE
Chemical tanker median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAFNIA AZURITE
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAFNIA AZURITE
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+6%	+17%	−58%	+97%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−20%	−16%	+6%	−22%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−46%	−38%	+827%	−65%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+102%	+95%	−86%	+186%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 102%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	−13%	−27%	+31%	−13%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.1 kn	+16%	+28%	+17%	+15%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	862	2,700	10,878	856	12.7	79.2	15.55	–
2024part-year	OSM Ship Management AS	1,918	5,995	25,666	2,219	11.6	74.7	7.89	–
2024	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	1,918	5,995	25,666	2,219	11.6	74.7	7.89	–
2023	not published	2,242	7,061	24,124	2,188	11.0	92.9	10.10	–
2022	not published	448	1,424	2,601	271	9.6	172.2	28.98	–
2021	not published	1,527	4,837	17,941	1,796	10.0	85.1	10.12	–
2020	not published	1,337	4,245	13,681	1,152	11.9	97.7	11.66	–
2018	not published	989	3,110	11,720	1,089	10.8	84.4	10.13	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	15.55	15.04	+3%	764 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	OSM Ship Management AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2024	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	7.89	16.73	−53%	90 of 1,274	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	10.10	16.23	−38%	221 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	28.98	16.06	+80%	1,112 of 1,409	DNV	C
2021	not published	10.12	16.69	−39%	185 of 1,343	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	11.66	16.16	−28%	303 of 1,312	Korean Register	B+C
2018	not published	10.13	17.14	−41%	181 of 1,294	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.