Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

DA JI

IMO: 9768538
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,706 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.8

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

9.37

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−62%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+36%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,435 t

CO₂ emitted

7,609 t

Distance sailed

28,368 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,152 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+116%)

17.4Ranks 2,391 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 9.3 (+35%)

6.9Faster than 94% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 56.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+121%)

10.2Ranks 2,481 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU36%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

338 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DA JI
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DA JI
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

DA JI
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.3 kn	−5%	+6%	+409%	+550%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−12%	−7%	+12%	−12%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+3%	−10%	−32%	+3%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+97%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	1,896	5,970	24,961	1,987	12.6	76.0	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	391	1,219	4,907	433	11.3	79.7	–	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2021	not published	1,691	5,292	21,665	1,770	12.2	78.0	14.9	–
2020	not published	1,709	5,330	19,304	1,672	11.5	88.5	18.5	–
2019	not published	2,435	7,609	28,368	2,152	13.2	85.8	19.6	–
2018	not published	1,279	3,997	14,396	1,098	13.1	88.9	47.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	56.4	25.5	+121%	2,481 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	8.68	19.3	−55%	181 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	8.54	22.7	−62%	63 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	9.65	24.5	−61%	84 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.37	25.0	−62%	67 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.70	24.9	−61%	91 of 1,044	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.