Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

DA QING

IMO: 9768540
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,266 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.9

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

9.93

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−60%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

941 t

CO₂ emitted

2,939 t

Distance sailed

10,349 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

853 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+103%)

17.4Ranks 2,304 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 9.3 (+30%)

6.9Faster than 90% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 82.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+224%)

10.2Ranks 2,600 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU0%
Into the EU95%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

143 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DA QING
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DA QING
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

DA QING
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+18%	+924%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−11%	−9%	−11%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	2,315	7,250	32,488	2,689	12.1	71.3	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	2,026	6,342	27,499	2,296	12.0	73.7	–	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	980	3,089	12,596	1,046	12.0	77.8	34.6	–
2021	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	751	2,344	9,261	747	12.4	81.1	11.9	–
2019	not published	941	2,939	10,349	853	12.1	90.9	25.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	82.6	25.5	+224%	2,600 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	8.06	19.3	−58%	140 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	8.57	21.6	−60%	87 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	8.85	24.5	−64%	67 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.93	25.0	−60%	85 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.