Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TIAN EN

IMO: 9774587
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,263 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.3

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

6.76

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−72%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,931 t

CO₂ emitted

15,396 t

Distance sailed

61,385 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,931 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+134%)

17.4Ranks 2,511 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 9.3 (+30%)

6.9Faster than 91% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 14.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−43%)

10.2Ranks 444 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU38%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

808 t

5.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIAN EN
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIAN EN
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIAN EN
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−2%	−6%	+17%	+105%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+9%	+11%	−66%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+3%	+1%	+573%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−12%	−13%	−84%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+7%	+8%	−3%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	+2%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−6%	−4%	−15%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	2,081	6,501	25,295	2,085	12.1	82.3	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	1,811	5,663	21,558	1,710	12.6	84.0	–	–
2023	not published	4,963	15,525	64,221	5,229	12.3	77.3	11.0	–
2022	not published	718	2,241	9,538	767	12.4	75.3	43.1	–
2021	not published	5,082	15,866	59,339	4,695	12.6	85.7	11.3	–
2020	not published	4,931	15,396	61,385	4,931	12.4	80.3	13.0	–
2019	not published	4,813	15,030	60,328	4,763	12.7	79.8	14.9	–
2018	not published	6,027	18,840	71,093	5,700	12.5	84.8	14.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	14.5	25.5	−43%	444 of 2,723	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS CO.,LTD.	7.08	19.3	−63%	88 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	6.51	20.7	−69%	47 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.33	21.6	−71%	37 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	7.20	22.7	−68%	34 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.76	24.5	−72%	21 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.71	25.0	−73%	12 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.14	24.9	−71%	29 of 1,044	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.